An honest comparison
Kordis vs Teambridge: AI agents, for whose desk? (2026)
Last updated . Competitor facts checked against the sources at the bottom of this page.
Teambridge is an AI-native workforce management platform for frontline teams: named AI agents (scheduling, timekeeping, compliance, onboarding) run the work under a policy engine your operations team configures, and you approve what they do. Pricing is demo-gated.
Kordis makes the same promise, the AI runs the work and you approve it, but builds it for an owner-led Canadian staffing agency instead of an enterprise operations department: nothing to configure, Ontario, BC, and Alberta rules in the bones, and one flat, published price.
What is Teambridge good at?
Teambridge is one of the most serious AI products in workforce management. Its agents genuinely run scheduling, timekeeping, compliance, and onboarding work under a configurable policy engine, it publishes named customer results (Levi's Stadium, Express Healthcare, United Staffing Solutions), and it holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. For a US multi-site operation with a team to configure it, it is a credible standard-setter.
- Real AI agents across scheduling, timekeeping, compliance, and onboarding, with human approval in the flow
- A policy engine that lets an operations team encode its own guardrails
- Named, published customer results (Levi's Stadium, Express Healthcare, United Staffing Solutions)
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified, with instant-pay and US-market integrations
How do Kordis and Teambridge compare?
| What matters | Kordis | Teambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Canadian temp staffing agencies with 25 to 200 workers | US enterprise and multi-site frontline operations with an ops team |
| Pricing | $249 a month founding rate for the first 3 months, then $499 a month flat, all-in, up to 200 active workers | Not published; demo-gated quote |
| AI approach | Say it in plain English; the work is staged for your one-tap OK, sources attached, money math deterministic | Named AI agents under a policy engine your team configures; you approve their work |
| Canadian rules | Ontario, BC, and Alberta rules built in: province of work, site scope, and readiness gates | No published provincial ESA, WSIB, or Canadian credential-card features |
| Screening | Smart Screen: applicant screening calls with transcripts and scores | Onboarding automation; phone screening is not the core job |
| Setup | Done-with-you setup on your own data | Agent and policy configuration owned by your team |
Teambridge does not publish pricing; its site is demo-gated (teambridge.com, checked 2026-08-03). The customer results quoted are Teambridge's own published case figures, and its named agents now also include a Payroll Administrator and an Attendance Coordinator alongside the four below.
Pick Teambridge if
- You run a US enterprise or multi-site operation with a team that can own agent and policy configuration
- You want instant pay for workers and US-market integrations in the same platform
- You are comfortable with demo-gated, quoted pricing and an enterprise sales process
Pick Kordis if
- You run an owner-led Canadian agency, not an enterprise operations department: it has to work with nothing to configure
- You need your province in the bones: stat pay with the math shown and role-specific credential gating
- You want money figures computed from your records, never authored by the part that writes sentences
- You want to see the price before you talk to anyone
Common questions
Aren't Kordis and Teambridge the same idea?
The promise rhymes: the AI runs the work, you approve it. The build diverges. Teambridge gives a US operations team agents and a policy engine to configure per department; Kordis gives an owner-led Canadian agency a desk that already knows its province's rules, with nothing to configure and a flat published price.
Does Teambridge handle Canadian provincial rules?
Teambridge publishes no provincial ESA, WSIB, or Canadian credential-card features (checked July 2026). In Kordis those are the bones: stat entitlements worked out with the math shown, and dispatch gated on the cards workers actually carry.
How do the two treat money math?
In Kordis, money figures are never written by the part of the product that writes sentences: stat pay and overtime splits are computed deterministically from your records, shown line by line, and nothing touching money goes out without your OK. Teambridge routes agent work through your configured policies and approvals; it publishes no equivalent provenance claim.
Who should clearly pick Teambridge?
A US multi-site operation with an operations team that wants to encode its own policies and tune agents per department. At that shape and scale its policy engine, published results, and certifications are genuinely strong.
Sources
The honest way to compare is on your own roster.
Create your account, bring a recent week, and start with your own shifts, workers, and hours.
Start two weeks freeRun your real operation for two weeks. No card to start, nothing charged.
- No card to start
- Nothing charged
- Cancel whenever
- Guided setup